From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CG Tech. Dev. v. Fanduel, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Sep 10, 2021
No. 2020-1695 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 10, 2021)

Opinion

2020-1695

09-10-2021

CG TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, LLC, INTERACTIVE GAMES LIMITED, INTERACTIVE GAMES LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. FANDUEL, INC., Defendant-Appellee

JASON LEE ROMRELL, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plain-tiffs-appellants. Also represented by JAMES R. BARNEY, CORA RENAE HOLT, J. MICHAEL JAKES, ROBERT SHAFFER. MEGAN JOANNA REDMOND, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by CAROLINE A. BADER, ERIC ALLAN BURESH.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:17-cv-01041-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

JASON LEE ROMRELL, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plain-tiffs-appellants. Also represented by JAMES R. BARNEY, CORA RENAE HOLT, J. MICHAEL JAKES, ROBERT SHAFFER.

MEGAN JOANNA REDMOND, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by CAROLINE A. BADER, ERIC ALLAN BURESH.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM

(NEWMAN, O'MALLEY, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

CG Tech. Dev. v. Fanduel, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Sep 10, 2021
No. 2020-1695 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 10, 2021)
Case details for

CG Tech. Dev. v. Fanduel, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CG TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT, LLC, INTERACTIVE GAMES LIMITED, INTERACTIVE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Sep 10, 2021

Citations

No. 2020-1695 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 10, 2021)

Citing Cases

Beteiro, LLC v. DraftKings Inc.

Notable, but not authoritative, is the fact that we have non-precedentially affirmed several district court…