From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

C.F.C. v. Power Balance LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 18, 2011
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-00487-EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:11-CV-00487-EMC

10-18-2011

C.F.C., minor, by and through CHRISTINE F his parent and guardian, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. POWER BALANCE LLC; a Delaware Limited Liability Company. Defendants.

STEVEN D. ALLISON (SBN 174491) SARAH K. SHAHOLLI (SBN 254943) KATE J. SANTON (SBN 265600) DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP Attorneys for Defendants POWER BALANCE, LLC


STEVEN D. ALLISON (SBN 174491)

SARAH K. SHAHOLLI (SBN 254943)

KATE J. SANTON (SBN 265600)

DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP

Attorneys for Defendants POWER

BALANCE, LLC

NATIONWIDE CLASS ACTION

Hon. Edward M. Chen

JOINT STIPULATION

REGARDING REQUEST FOR

CONTINUED STAY OF CASE

PENDING COURT

CONSIDERATION OF WHETHER

TO GRANT FINAL APPROVAL OF

THE NATIONWIDE CLASS

SETTLEMENT IN THE

BATUNGBACAL ACTION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED

Complaint filed: February 1, 2011

Trial Date: None Set

JOINT STIPULATION

Plaintiff C.F.C., minor, by and through Christine F., his parent and guardian ("Plaintiff") and Power Balance LLC ("Defendant") stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on March 25, 2011, a nationwide class settlement agreement ("class settlement") was filed by plaintiff Andre Batungbacal in the action styled Batungbacal v. Power Balance LLC, et al., SACV11-00018 CJC (MLGx), pending in the Central District of California before the Honorable Cormac C. Carney (the "Batungbacal Action") (Batungbacal Dkt. No. 9);

WHEREAS, on April 27, 2011, the Court in the Batungbacal Action granted preliminary approval of the class settlement (Id. at No. 36);

WHEREAS, on May 27, 2011 this Court granted Defendant's unopposed motion to stay the case until after the Batungbacal Court issued a ruling regarding final approval of the proposed nationwide class settlement (Dkt. No. 20);

WHEREAS, on June 20, 2011, due to concerns over Power Balance's financial condition, the Court in the Batungbacal Action vacated its preliminary approval of the class settlement and gave the parties sixty (60) additional days to conduct discovery and determine if a new settlement could be effectuated (Batungbacal Dkt. No. 62);

WHEREAS, over the next several months, the parties in the Batungbacal Action engaged in discovery and negotiations to reach a new class settlement;

WHEREAS, on September 22, 2011, the parties in the Batungbacal Action filed a new nationwide class action settlement agreement and Plaintiff filed a renewed motion for preliminary approval (Id. at No. 69);

WHEREAS the hearing on Plaintiff's motion for preliminary approval of the class settlement in the Batungbacal Action is set for November 21, 2011;

WHEREAS, the allegations and claims made in the Batungbacal Action are similar to certain allegations in this action and it is Defendant's position that, if final approval of the nationwide class settlement in the Batungbacal Action is granted, it will release and have preclusive effect over the putative class' allegations and claims in this action;

WHEREAS, in light of the nationwide class settlement and pending motion for preliminary approval in the Batungbacal Action, and the possible impact of those proceedings on this action, the Parties hereby request that this Court continue the stay of this action for a period sixty (60) days pending the outcome of the preliminary approval hearing on November 21, 2011;

WHEREAS, if Batungbacal Court grants preliminary approval of the nationwide class settlement, the Parties will thereafter file a request to renew the stay of this action pending the outcome on final approval of the Batungbacal class action settlement.

Accordingly, it is hereby stipulated and agreed that all deadlines imposed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Local Rules of Civil Procedure be stayed in this action for a period of sixty (60) days from the date of entry of the Order granting this Joint Stipulation.

DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP

Steven D. Allison

Sarah K. Shaholli

Kate J. Santon

Attorneys for Defendants

LEXINGTON LAW GROUP

Mark Todzo

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Case Management Conference set for 11/04/2011 is continued to 12/16/2011 at 9:00 a.m.

Judge Edward M. Chen


Summaries of

C.F.C. v. Power Balance LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 18, 2011
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-00487-EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

C.F.C. v. Power Balance LLC

Case Details

Full title:C.F.C., minor, by and through CHRISTINE F his parent and guardian, on…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 3:11-CV-00487-EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)