From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CF HY LLC v. Hudson Yards LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 20, 2015
124 A.D.3d 490 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2015-01-20

CF HY LLC, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. HUDSON YARDS LLC, et al., Defendants, Baruch Singer, Defendant–Appellant.

Katsky Korins, New York (Joel S. Weiss of counsel), for appellant. Sills Cummis & Gross P.C., New York (Mitchell D. Haddad and Jessica R. Brand of counsel), for respondent.


Katsky Korins, New York (Joel S. Weiss of counsel), for appellant. Sills Cummis & Gross P.C., New York (Mitchell D. Haddad and Jessica R. Brand of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered July 10, 2014, in favor of plaintiff in the total amount of $25,764,306.96, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeals from orders, same court and Justice, entered on or about December 4, 2013 and January 14, 2014, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

The court's determination of the mortgaged property's fair market value was within the range of the conflicting expert testimony and was otherwise supported by the evidence presented at the hearing ( see generally Trustco Bank v. Gardner, 274 A.D.2d 873, 711 N.Y.S.2d 597 [3d Dept.2000] ). The court properly considered the purchase price of the property after the foreclosure sale ( see Plaza Hotel Assoc. v. Wellington Assoc., 37 N.Y.2d 273, 277, 372 N.Y.S.2d 35, 333 N.E.2d 346 [1975] ).

The court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendant-appellant's request for an adjournment of the hearing until after he testified as a party witness in a separate trial ( see Pezhman v. Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 113 A.D.3d 417, 417, 977 N.Y.S.2d 886 [1st Dept.2014], lv. denied 22 N.Y.3d 863, 2014 WL 702123 [2014], cert. denied ––– U.S. ––––, 134 S.Ct. 2303, 189 L.Ed.2d 175 [2014] ).

We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them unavailing. TOM, J.P., SAXE, FEINMAN, CLARK, KAPNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

CF HY LLC v. Hudson Yards LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 20, 2015
124 A.D.3d 490 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

CF HY LLC v. Hudson Yards LLC

Case Details

Full title:CF HY LLC, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. HUDSON YARDS LLC, et al., Defendants…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 20, 2015

Citations

124 A.D.3d 490 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 474
998 N.Y.S.2d 301

Citing Cases

Nexbank, SSB v. Soffer

To be sure, as plaintiff correctly contends, it is well settled that in the absence of a bona fide basis to…

Madison 96th Assocs., LLC v. 17 E. 96th Owners Corp.

This principle is well settled under New York law. See CF HY LLC v Hudson Yards LLC, 124 AD3d 490 (1st Dept…