From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CF Crespe LLC v. Silicon Labs. Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 8, 2016
2016-1526 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 8, 2016)

Opinion

2016-1526

11-08-2016

CF CRESPE LLC, Appellant v. SILICON LABORATORIES INC., Appellee

CRAIG ROBERT SMITH, Lando & Anastasi, LLP, Cambridge, MA, argued for appellant. Also represented by ERIC P. CARNEVALE, WILLIAM JOSEPH SEYMOUR. PETER J. AYERS, Lee & Hayes, PLLC, Austin, TX, argued for appellee.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-00728.

JUDGMENT

CRAIG ROBERT SMITH, Lando & Anastasi, LLP, Cambridge, MA, argued for appellant. Also represented by ERIC P. CARNEVALE, WILLIAM JOSEPH SEYMOUR. PETER J. AYERS, Lee & Hayes, PLLC, Austin, TX, argued for appellee. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (TARANTO, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 8, 2016

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

CF Crespe LLC v. Silicon Labs. Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 8, 2016
2016-1526 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 8, 2016)
Case details for

CF Crespe LLC v. Silicon Labs. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CF CRESPE LLC, Appellant v. SILICON LABORATORIES INC., Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 8, 2016

Citations

2016-1526 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 8, 2016)

Citing Cases

MaxLinear, Inc. v. CF Crespe LLC

The Board upheld the patentability of claims 1-4, 6-9, and 16-21 of U.S. Patent No. 7,075,585 ("the '585…