From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cevasco v. Allegiant Travel Co.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 14, 2022
2:22-cv-01741-JAD-EJY (D. Nev. Nov. 14, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01741-JAD-EJY

11-14-2022

ROBERT CEVASCO, on behalf of Allegiant 401k Retirement Plan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ALLEGIANT TRAVEL COMPANY Defendant.

Deverie J. Christensen Phillip C. Thompson JACKSON LEWIS P.C. RENE E. THORNE (pro hac vice Pending) HOWARD SHAPIRO (pro hac vice Pending) JACKSON LEWIS P.C. Attorneys for Defendants Michael Kind, KIND LAW Brandon J. Hill (pro hac vice Pending) WENZEL FENTON CABASSA, P.A. Eric Lechtzin (pro hac vice Pending) Michael C McKay (pro hac vice Pending) MCKAY LAW, LLC COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS


Deverie J. Christensen Phillip C. Thompson JACKSON LEWIS P.C. RENE E. THORNE (pro hac vice Pending) HOWARD SHAPIRO (pro hac vice Pending) JACKSON LEWIS P.C. Attorneys for Defendants

Michael Kind, KIND LAW Brandon J. Hill (pro hac vice Pending) WENZEL FENTON CABASSA, P.A. Eric Lechtzin (pro hac vice Pending) Michael C McKay (pro hac vice Pending) MCKAY LAW, LLC COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE (FIRST REQUEST) ECF No. 6

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Defendant, Allegiant Travel Company, and Plaintiff Robert Cevasco, by and through their respective counsel, to extend the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1) and set a briefing schedule for Defendant's anticipated motion to dismiss, Plaintiff's opposition, and Defendant's reply. This Stipulation is submitted and based upon the following:

On October 17, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a Class Action Complaint (ECF No. 1) and served Defendant on October 26, 2022, making Defendant's responsive pleading in this class action case due on November 16, 2022.

Given the complexity of the case, the parties agreed jointly to request an extension of Defendant's pleading deadline by 60 days, through and including January 13, 2023.

Moreover, after consultations among the Parties, Defendant will file a Motion to Dismiss. Thus, the Parties have stipulated to and request the Court approve the following briefing schedule:

PROPOSED SCHEDULE

1. January 13, 2023 - Deadline for Defendant to file responsive pleadings.

2. January 13, 2023 - Deadline for Defendant to file its Motion to Dismiss.

3. January 27, 2023 - Deadline for Plaintiffs to file a Response (Opposition) to Motion to Dismiss.

4. February 17, 2023 - Deadline for Defendant to file a Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss.

This is the first request for an extension of time for Defendant to file a response to Plaintiffs' Complaint and to set a briefing schedule on Defendant's anticipated motion to dismiss.

This request is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.

Nothing in this Stipulation, nor the fact of entering to the same, shall have the effect of or be construed as waiving any claim or defense held by any party hereto.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Cevasco v. Allegiant Travel Co.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 14, 2022
2:22-cv-01741-JAD-EJY (D. Nev. Nov. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Cevasco v. Allegiant Travel Co.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT CEVASCO, on behalf of Allegiant 401k Retirement Plan, individually…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 14, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01741-JAD-EJY (D. Nev. Nov. 14, 2022)