From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cetina v. Michelin N. Am.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 26, 2013
539 F. App'x 294 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-1864

2013-09-26

TANYA LYNN CETINA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA; NEWBOLD SERVICES; CLINT MORGAN; DAVE MURPHY; DAVE BROWN; DAVE MAUGER, Defendants - Appellees, and SANDRA CHAVEZ, Defendant.

Tanya Lynn Cetina, Appellant Pro Se. Collie William Lehn, Jr., Fred W. Suggs, Jr., OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South Carolina; Sima Bhakta Patel, Thomas Louis Stephenson, NEXSEN PRUET, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (6:12-cv-02222-TMC-JDA) Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tanya Lynn Cetina, Appellant Pro Se. Collie William Lehn, Jr., Fred W. Suggs, Jr., OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South Carolina; Sima Bhakta Patel, Thomas Louis Stephenson, NEXSEN PRUET, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tanya Lynn Cetina seeks to appeal the district court's orders adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss her claims against Defendants Dave Mauger and Michelin North America, Incorporated. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). Because Cetina's claims against several other Defendants remain, the orders Cetina seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Cetina v. Michelin N. Am.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 26, 2013
539 F. App'x 294 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Cetina v. Michelin N. Am.

Case Details

Full title:TANYA LYNN CETINA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 26, 2013

Citations

539 F. App'x 294 (4th Cir. 2013)