Opinion
11264-22
07-12-2022
M. TARIK CETIN Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
ORDER
Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge
On May 12, 2022, petitioner filed the petition to commence this whistleblower case pursuant to Internal Revenue Code section 7623. Due to an inadvertent clerical error, this case was not designated as a whistleblower case by including a "W" in the docket number.
The parties are reminded that, under Rule 345(b), Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, in a filing with the Court in a whistleblower action, the party making the filing "shall refrain from including, or shall take appropriate steps to redact, the name, address, and other identifying information of the taxpayer to whom the claim relates." Rule 345(b) further provides that the party "filing a document that contains redacted information shall file under seal a reference list that identifies each item of redacted information and specifies an appropriate identifier that uniquely corresponds to each item listed."
Petitioner did not refrain from including in the petition identifying information with respect to the taxpayer to whom petitioner's claim relates (the target taxpayer) or fully redact the petition and its attachments as to references to the target taxpayer and provide a reference list of redacted information. Accordingly, the Court will seal the petition.
Upon due consideration and for cause, it is
ORDERED that the caption of this case is amended by adding the letter "W" to the docket number. It is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall add the letter "W" to the docket sheet and other records of her office and process this case to trial or other disposition according to the procedures provided by Rules 340 through 345, Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure. It is further
ORDERED that the petition, filed May 12, 2022, is sealed from public view and it shall be retained by the Court in a sealed file which shall not be inspected by any person or entity not a party to this case, except by an Order of the Court. It is further
ORDERED that, when filing or lodging unsealed documents in this case in the future, the parties shall refrain from including, or take appropriate steps to redact the name, address, and other identifying information of the target taxpayer and, when appropriate, either (1) Docket No. concurrently file or lodge under seal a reference list that identifies each item of redacted information and specifies an appropriate identifier that uniquely corresponds to each item listed or (2) concurrently file or lodge under seal an unredacted version of any redacted document that is filed or lodged. Documents filed under seal must be submitted to the Court in paper form.
If utilizing the first method, the parties shall file or lodge redacted versions of documents accompanied by a reference list of redacted information, which must be filed or lodged under seal and specifically identify and state each item of redacted information (for example, when the target taxpayer's name is redacted, the reference list must identify that redaction and also state the target taxpayer's name). Subsequent references in the case to a listed identifier will be construed to refer to the corresponding item of information.
If utilizing the second method, the versions shall be clearly marked as "Unredacted" or "Redacted", as appropriate, and the redacted version shall be an exact duplicate of the corresponding unredacted version, including attachments and exhibits, except for the redactions made with respect to the identifying information of the target taxpayer.