From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cestaro v. Prohaska

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 22, 2022
22-cv-9444 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 22, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-9444 (JSR)

12-22-2022

Joseph Cestaro, Plaintiff, v. Michael Prohaska and Construction And General Building Laborers Local 79, Defendants.


ORDER

JED S. RAKOFF, U.S.D.J.

As stated on the record during the Court's 12/22/22 hearing, the Court determines that several of Cestaro's claims (including but not limited to his breach of contract, wrongful termination, and tortious interference with contract claims) require interpreting a union constitution and are therefore completely preempted by and arise under Section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act. 29 U.S.C. § 185(a). As also stated on the record, each of Cestaro's claims that does not arise under federal law shares a common factual core with his federally preempted claims and this Court therefore has supplemental jurisdiction over them. 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a). The Court therefore denies Cestaro's motion to remand. The Clerk is respectfully directed to close entry # 10 on the docket.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cestaro v. Prohaska

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 22, 2022
22-cv-9444 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Cestaro v. Prohaska

Case Details

Full title:Joseph Cestaro, Plaintiff, v. Michael Prohaska and Construction And…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 22, 2022

Citations

22-cv-9444 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 22, 2022)