From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cesarez v. Yolo County Superior Court

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 15, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2541-FCD-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-2541-FCD-CMK-P.

February 15, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, who is proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.

On January 15, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 20 days. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 15, 2008, are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed, without prejudice;

3. The request for a certificate of appealability is denied; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.


Summaries of

Cesarez v. Yolo County Superior Court

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 15, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2541-FCD-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2008)
Case details for

Cesarez v. Yolo County Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD CESAREZ, Petitioner, v. YOLO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 15, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-2541-FCD-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2008)