From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cervini v. Greystone Building Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 23, 2006
26 A.D.3d 282 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

7940N.

February 23, 2006.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Nelson Roman, J.), entered on or about October 12, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from, denied so much of plaintiff's motion as sought an order striking the answer of defendants Ju Jeung Kim and Greystone Deli and Grocery, and directed said defendants to appear for depositions by November 10, 2004, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Michael A. Cervini, P.C., Jackson Heights (Robin Mary Heaney of counsel), for appellant.

Ira B. Pollack Associates, PLLC, New York (Ira B. Pollack of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Williams and Malone, JJ.


Defendants demonstrated a reasonable excuse for failing to comply with deposition orders inasmuch as Kim was not fluent in English and thus could not understand the notices forwarded by counsel. Under the circumstances, the court providently exercised its discretion in requiring depositions by a date certain, or the preclusion from offering testimony at trial ( see Palmenta v. Columbia Univ., 266 AD2d 90).


Summaries of

Cervini v. Greystone Building Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 23, 2006
26 A.D.3d 282 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Cervini v. Greystone Building Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOE CERVINI, Appellant, v. GREYSTONE BUILDING CO., Defendant, and JU JEUNG…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 23, 2006

Citations

26 A.D.3d 282 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1374
810 N.Y.S.2d 49