From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cervantez v. TDT Consulting, LLC

United States District Court NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 21, 2019
CASE NO. 3:18-CV-2547-S-BN (N.D. Tex. Aug. 21, 2019)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:18-CV-2547-S-BN

08-21-2019

MATTHEW CERVANTEZ, individually and on behalf others similarly situated under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), v. TDT CONSULTING, LLC


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated July 22, 2019, the Court finds that the Findings Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge are accepted.

The Court hereby OVERRULES Defendant's Objection [ECF No. 12] and GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Conditional Certification of Collective Action and Judicially-Supervised Notice Under Section 216(b) [ECF No. 10]. Specifically, the Court conditionally certifies the case as a collective action but denies Plaintiff's request for equitable toling. In addition, the Court grants Cervantez's request to distribute the Notice through mail, email, text message, posting at the workplace, posting online at the proposed website, and inclusion in current employee's paychecks; grants Cervantez's request that potential opt-in plaintiffs be afforded the opportunity to electronically sign their consent forms on the proposed website; denies Cervantez's request to use Facebook and LinkedIn as a method for notice delivery; denies Cervantez's request to use the current Notice and orders him to submit an edited Notice to potential class members for the Court's review within two of this Order; grants Cervantez's request for production of information; and grants Cervantez's proposed mailing and opt-in dates.

SO ORDERED.

SIGNED August 21, 2019.

/s/ _________

KAREN GREN SCHOLER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cervantez v. TDT Consulting, LLC

United States District Court NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 21, 2019
CASE NO. 3:18-CV-2547-S-BN (N.D. Tex. Aug. 21, 2019)
Case details for

Cervantez v. TDT Consulting, LLC

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW CERVANTEZ, individually and on behalf others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Aug 21, 2019

Citations

CASE NO. 3:18-CV-2547-S-BN (N.D. Tex. Aug. 21, 2019)

Citing Cases

Wilburn v. Lehman's Pipe & Steel

i. Tolling Plaintiff appears to make three arguments as to why the statute of limitations should be tolled in…

Kalenga v. Irving Holdings

4 (citing Def.'s App. 2). "These allegations are sufficient to demonstrate that 'it is reasonable to believe…