From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CERVANTES v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE

Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle County
Feb 24, 2009
C.A. No. 07C-06-249-JRJ (Del. Super. Ct. Feb. 24, 2009)

Opinion

C.A. No. 07C-06-249-JRJ.

February 24, 2009.


ORDER


AND NOW TO WIT, this 24th day of February, 2009, the Court having heard and duly considered the Defendants' Application for Certification to the Supreme Court of the Court's January 29, 2009 Order Denying Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss on the Grounds of Forum Non Conveniens, and Plaintiffs' Response thereto, and having found that such Order does not meet the criteria of Supreme Court Rule 42(b), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Application for Certification is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

cc: Prothonotary — Original Timothy E. Lengkeek, Esq. Christian J. Singewald, Esq. Somers S. Price, Jr., Esq.


Summaries of

CERVANTES v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE

Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle County
Feb 24, 2009
C.A. No. 07C-06-249-JRJ (Del. Super. Ct. Feb. 24, 2009)
Case details for

CERVANTES v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE

Case Details

Full title:Rosa Laura Cervantes, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of…

Court:Superior Court of Delaware, New Castle County

Date published: Feb 24, 2009

Citations

C.A. No. 07C-06-249-JRJ (Del. Super. Ct. Feb. 24, 2009)