From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cerullo v. Cerullo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 30, 1972
40 A.D.2d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

November 30, 1972

Appeal from the Erie Special Term.

Present — Goldman, P.J., Marsh, Moule and Henry, JJ.


Order and judgment unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Paragraph 12 of the land contract sought to be enforced permits the vendor to extinguish the rights of the vendee only upon the obtaining of a final order in a summary dispossess proceeding. Since plaintiff as vendor under a land contract cannot maintain such a proceeding (see 16 Carmody-Wait 2d, New York Practice, § 98.5), we find nothing in the language of paragraph 12 which would entitle plaintiff to extinguish the rights of the vendee upon failure to pay installments due. The contract does not provide for acceleration of installment payments nor does it provide for a forfeiture of the vendee's rights under the contract by virtue of a default. In such a circumstance an action to foreclose the contract and extinguish the rights of the vendee may not be maintained (1A Warren's Weed, New York Real Property, Contracts, § 11.04; Hinman v. Hinman, 146 Misc. 786). Plaintiff's remedy would be an action against the vendee for the unpaid installments and not a foreclosure of his rights under the contract resulting in a forfeiture of the substantial sums already paid, representing the vendor's entire equity in the property.


Summaries of

Cerullo v. Cerullo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 30, 1972
40 A.D.2d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Cerullo v. Cerullo

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH CERULLO, Respondent, v. JOHN J. CERULLO et al., Appellants (Appeal…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1972

Citations

40 A.D.2d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

Lambert v. Schiller

However, in the instant case, the defendants' options are even more limited because there is no clause in the…

Gagnon v. Charlton

This appeal ensued. Contrary to defendant's contention and misplaced reliance on Cerullo v. Cerullo ( 40…