Opinion
NOVEMBER 13, 2000
00-5719 KNIGHT v. UNITED STATES. C.A.3d Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Reported below: 216 F.3d 1077.
00-6086 ALFORD v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (AYERS, WARDEN, REAL PARTY IN INTEREST). C.A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8.
00-6099 SOUTHERLAND v. HEINE ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. Reported below: 212 F.3d 598.
00-6112 RENOIR v. HOLLIFIELD ET AL. C.A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8.
00-6151 DeNARDO v. BARRANS ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court's Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) ( per curiam). JUSTICE STEVENS dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited therein. Reported below: 230 F.3d 1366.