From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Granted

U.S.
Jan 8, 2001
531 U.S. 1100 (2001)

Opinion

JANUARY 8, 2001


00-7226 HUBERTY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. Armed Forces. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 53 M. J. 369.

00-7227 IZQUIERDO-SALAS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 232 F.3d 208.

00-7228 HILL v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 234 F.3d 1274.

00-7229 GARCIA-SEGURA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 232 F.3d 208.

00-7230 GULLER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 213 F.3d 633.

00-7231 HELBLING v. UNITED STATES. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 209 F.3d 226.

00-7233 GALICIA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 234 F.3d 1279.

00-7234 FINITZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 234 F.3d 1278.

00-7235 JONES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 226 F.3d 646.

00-7236 EDWARDS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 225 F.3d 991.

00-7237 BRASHARS v. KENTUCKY. Sup.Ct. Ky. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 25 S.W.3d 58.

00-7238 PLASCENCIA-GARCIA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-7240 KENT v. OHIO. Ct. App. Ohio, Crawford County. Certiorari denied.

00-7244 KYLE v. UNITED STATES. Ct. App.D.C. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 759 A.2d 192.

00-7246 PARKER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 225 F.3d 556.

00-7248 VALENCIA-BURGOS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Granted

U.S.
Jan 8, 2001
531 U.S. 1100 (2001)
Case details for

Certiorari Granted

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI GRANTED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 8, 2001

Citations

531 U.S. 1100 (2001)

Citing Cases

State v. Lockhart

stitution does not require electronic recording of custodial statements); State v. Rhoades, 121 Idaho 63, 73,…

U.S. v. Whittaker

Our review of the sufficiency of the evidence after a conviction is "highly deferential." See United States…