From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 1, 2001
534 U.S. 872 (2001)

Opinion

OCTOBER 1, 2001


No. 00-10669 BERNAL MENDOZA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 5 Fed. Appx. 752.

No. 00-10670 QUESADA-MOSQUERA v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 243 F.3d 685.

No. 00-10671 FACUNDO v. HOLDER, WARDEN, ET AL.; FACUNDO v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION; and FACUNDO v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-10672 DIJULIO v. UNITED STATES. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 262 F.3d 404.

No. 00-10673 ANDRESON v. WEBER, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-10674 SMITH v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 247 R.3d 245.

No. 00-10675 SMITH v. ALABAMA. Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 795 So.2d 788.

No. 00-10676 SIMS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-10677 McCOY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. D.C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 242 F.3d 399.

No. 00-10678 POLSON v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-10679 ARIAS-CASTRO, AKA DIAZ-GONZALEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 252 F.3d 443.

No. 00-10680 AVERY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 232 F.3d 886.

No. 00-10681 SUAREZ-MORALES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 246 F.3d 683.

No. 00-10682 DEAN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 248 F.3d 1183.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 1, 2001
534 U.S. 872 (2001)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 1, 2001

Citations

534 U.S. 872 (2001)

Citing Cases

Whatley v. State

However, “ ‘We have upheld a similar reasonable doubt instruction against a claim of plain error.’ Smith v.…

U.S. v. Dicks

Subsection (c)(1)(B) is also inapplicable because modification of a sentence due to post-conviction…