From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Nov 13, 2000
531 U.S. 1001 (2000)

Summary

noting irony of "statute intended to promote competition [but that] creates two levels of regulatory control"

Summary of this case from Southern N.E. Telephone. v. Public Utility Control

Opinion

NOVEMBER 13, 2000


00-6543 McMUTUARY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 217 F.3d 477.

00-6545 DeJESUS v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 219 F.3d 117.

00-6547 JACKSON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 230 F.3d 1360.

00-6549 MERCADO-OROZCO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below:

00-6556 YOUNG v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below:

00-6560 MINOR v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-6566 DIAZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 213 F.3d 629.

00-6569 LINIETSKY v. NEW YORK STATE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE SECOND AND ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICTS. Ct. App. N.Y. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 95 N.Y.2d 791, 733 N.E.2d 229.

00-6588 SIMON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 228 F.3d 413.

00-6591 WILSON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-6605 WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 217 F.3d 751.

00-6609 MORGAN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-214 QWEST CORP. v. MCI WORLDCOM NETWORK, SERVICES, INC., ET AL.; QWEST CORP. v. ATT COMMUNICATIONS OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST, INC., ET AL.; and QUEST CORP. v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO. L.P. ET AT. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE O'CONNOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 204 F.3d 1262 (first judgment); 211 F.3d 1276 (second and third judgments).


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Nov 13, 2000
531 U.S. 1001 (2000)

noting irony of "statute intended to promote competition [but that] creates two levels of regulatory control"

Summary of this case from Southern N.E. Telephone. v. Public Utility Control
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 13, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 1001 (2000)

Citing Cases

US West Communications, Inc. v. Jennings

See id. at 750-51, 755-59. Because the Eighth Circuit is the sole forum for addressing the validity of those…

U.S. West Comm. v. Washington Utilities

We review de novo whether the arbitrated agreements are in compliance with the Act and the implementing…