From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 30, 2000
531 U.S. 968 (2000)

Summary

holding that dismissing a habeas petition as time-barred under the AEDPA does not violate the Suspension Clause because petitioner had "years" to file the petition and gave no explanation why he failed to file on time

Summary of this case from Brempong v. Chertoff

Opinion

OCTOBER 30, 2000


00-6009 ROBINSON v. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 220 F.3d 584.

00-6011 BROWN v. TERHUNE, DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 215 F.3d 1332.

00-6013 TOWNSEND v. CRIST, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-6017 MAYS v. HICKMAN, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 217 F.3d 845.

00-6047 BUTLER v. CRAWFORD, WARDEN. Sup.Ct. Nav. Certiorari denied.

00-6054 JACKSON v. WYOMING. Sup.Ct. Wyo. Certiorari denied.

00-6056 HAGER v. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-6065 GONZALEZ v. AYERS, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-6067 HALBLEIB v. WYOMING. Sup.Ct. Wyo. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 7 P.3d 45.

00-6069 HAMMOND v. LUCAS COUNTY SERVICES BOARD. Sup.Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 88 Ohio St.3d 1479, 727 N.E.2d 131.

00-6074 WARREN, DAVID v. GARVIN, SUPERINTENDENT, MID-ORANGE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 219 F.3d 111.

00-6085 BARNES v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 208 F.3d 204.

00-6092 SULT v. TERHUNE, DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-6095 SCHOENBOHM v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. C.A. D.C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 204 F.3d 243.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 30, 2000
531 U.S. 968 (2000)

holding that dismissing a habeas petition as time-barred under the AEDPA does not violate the Suspension Clause because petitioner had "years" to file the petition and gave no explanation why he failed to file on time

Summary of this case from Brempong v. Chertoff

holding that dismissing a habeas petition as time-barred under the AEDPA does not violate the Suspension Clause because petitioner had "years" to file the petition and gave no explanation why he failed to file on time

Summary of this case from Saavedra De Barreto v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 30, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 968 (2000)

Citing Cases

Vega v. Artuz

Third, a court may, under some circumstances, issue such a retroactive stay even if the petitioner refiled…

Townsend v. Dingle

The Supreme Court denied a writ of certiorari. See Townsend v. Crist, 531 U.S. 968 (2000). On October 23,…