From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
May 21, 2001
532 U.S. 1040 (2001)

Summary

holding that city noise ordinance does not reach a substantial amount of constitutionally protected conduct

Summary of this case from State v. Holcombe

Opinion

MAY 21, 2001


No. 00-8545. DENNIS v. LOWE, ASSISTANT WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8575. TYSON v. ALABAMA. Sup.Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 784 So.2d 357.

No. 00-8583. ROLLER v. MISSOURI. Ct. App. Mo., Southern Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 31 S.W.3d 152.

No. 00-8967. MAGGIO v. NORM REEVES HONDA ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 246 F.3d 674.

No. 00-8972. WATERS v. OREGON. Ct. App. Ore. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 165 Or. App. 645, 997 P.2d 279.

No. 00-8975. SCHRADER v. TEXAS. Ct. App. Tex., 3d Dist Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8981. DUTTON v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY GOVERNMENT ET AL. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 232 F.3d 887.

No. 00-8982. ASHANTI v. LOCKYER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8985. MENDOZA v. CALIFORNIA. Sup. Cal. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 24 Cal.4th 130, 6 P.3d 510.

No. 00-8989. SONHOUSE v. NYNEX CORP. ET AL. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 225 F.3d 646.

No. 00-8991. RODRIGUEZ v. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 244 F.3d 142.

No. 00-8992. CADOREE v. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8996. MILLER v. NORTH CAROLINA C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 238 F.3d 416.

No. 00-8997. O'KEEFE v. CALIFORNIA. Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-9007. JAMES v. ALABAMA. Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 788 So.2d 185.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
May 21, 2001
532 U.S. 1040 (2001)

holding that city noise ordinance does not reach a substantial amount of constitutionally protected conduct

Summary of this case from State v. Holcombe

differentiating between errors that involve failure to comply with mandatory statutory procedures from other types of errors

Summary of this case from State v. T. C. (In re T.C.)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 21, 2001

Citations

532 U.S. 1040 (2001)

Citing Cases

McNabb v. State

Hearsay is generally not admissible "because it violates the right of confrontation and cross-examination…

State v. T. C. (In re T.C.)

This accords with our longstanding recognition that the state's failure to comply with an "integral part of…