From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Mar 5, 2001
532 U.S. 913 (2001)

Summary

treating provisions of article first, § 8, and sixth amendment as "essentially coextensive"

Summary of this case from State v. Drakeford

Opinion

MARCH 5, 2001


No. 00-8394. CARD v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 242 F.3d 391.

No. 00-8395. QUINN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8403. RICHARDSON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 233 F.3d 1285.

No. 00-8405. BOGGS v. COLLINS, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 226 F.3d 728.

No. 00-8406. BROWN v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 232 F.3d 44.

No. 00-8433. NARVAEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 225 F.3d 647.

No. 00-8437. MENDOZA-DE LA PARRA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8438. JOSEPH v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 237 F.3d 635.

No. 00-8441. DUNBAR v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 238 F.3d 424.

No. 00-8445. RICKS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 232 F.3d 892.

No. 00-8453. DICKS v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8458. TAYLOR v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 248 F.3d 1139.

No. 00-8467. SIMMONS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 237 F.3d 634.

No. 00-8478. FERNANDEZ v. CONNECTICUT. Sup.Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 254 Conn. 637, 758 A.2d 842.

No. 00-906. ERIE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. ERIE COUNTY RETIREES ASSN. ET AL. C.A.3d Cir. Motions of Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund, American association of Health Plans, Inc., et al., and ERISA Industry Committee for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 220 F.3d 193.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Mar 5, 2001
532 U.S. 913 (2001)

treating provisions of article first, § 8, and sixth amendment as "essentially coextensive"

Summary of this case from State v. Drakeford
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 5, 2001

Citations

532 U.S. 913 (2001)
121 S. Ct. 1245

Citing Cases

Erie County Retirees Ass'n v. County of Erie, Pa.

This Court has previously set forth the extensive differences between the two insurance plans and it is…

Ziyad Mini Market v. U.S.

Indeed, even in criminal cases, in which courts are particularly careful to safeguard defendants' rights,…