From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 15, 2001
534 U.S. 972 (2001)

Opinion

OCTOBER 15, 2001


No. 00-9722 HALL v. ILLINOIS. Sup.Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 194 Ill.2d 305, 743 N.E.2d 521.

No. 00-10149 YUNG-MING CHEN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 248 F.3d 1143.

No. 00-10231 CRAWFORD v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 239 F.3d 1086.

No. 00-10373 MARTIN v. UNITED STATES; and

No. 00-10664 HAMILTON, AKA BROWN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 1 Fed. Appx. 174.

No. 00-10604 ROSS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 243 F.3d 375.

No. 00-10760 HOLBERG, AKA JOHNSON v. TEXAS. Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 38 S.W.3d 137.

No. 01-40 COLWELL v. GEORGIA. Sup.Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 Ga. 634, 544 S.E.2d 120.

No. 01-62 COX ET AL. v. CITY OF WICHITA FALLS ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 253 F.3d 700.

No. 01-77 HETREED v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 6 Fed. Appx. 397.

No. 01-86 SLINGER DRAINAGE v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. C.A. D.C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 237 F.3d 681.

No. 01-167 JACKSON ET AL. v. WEST TELEMARKETING CORP. ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 245 F.3d 518.

No. 01-253 ORR ET AL. v. OHIO. Sup.Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 91 Ohio St.3d 389, 745 N.E.2d 1036.

No. 01-271 NORTHWEST VILLAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ET AL. v. FRANKE ET AL. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 241 F.3d 1005.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 15, 2001
534 U.S. 972 (2001)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 15, 2001

Citations

534 U.S. 972 (2001)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Johnson

The evidence was not properly objected to at trial, so we review for plain error. SeeUnited States v.…

U.S. v. Hoffman

" The Fourth Circuit stood with the majority of Courts which had considered the issue. See United States v.…