From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Mar 26, 2001
532 U.S. 952 (2001)

Opinion

MARCH 26, 2001


No. 00-8625. BROOKS-BEY v. KUPEC, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 238 F.3d 410.

No. 00-8630. COFIELD v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 233 F.3d 405.

No. 00-8633. MCSHEFFREY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 230 F.3d 1353.

No. 00-8636. ZEIDELL v. PLANTER, ADMINISTRATOR, NEW JERSEY ADULT DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT CENTER. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8647. BATES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 240 F.3d 1073.

No. 00-8654. MCKENNA v. HALTER, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 246 F.3d 675.

No. 00-8656. ROJAS-FLORES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 243 F.3d 551.

No. 00-8658. SEARCY v. ILLINOIS. App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: ___ Ill. App.3d ___, ___ N.E.2d ___.

No. 00-8659. BOYLES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 235 F.3d 1057.

No. 00-8660. CHIRINOS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 228 F.3d 412.

No. 00-8661. TUCKER v. UNITED STATES. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 229 F.3d 1140.

No. 00-8668. HUSBANDS, AKA LNU v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 238 F.3d 416.

No. 00-8674. MORENO-ZAMARRON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 248 F.3d 1174.

No. 8682. LOWNSBERY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-8685. JONES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Mar 26, 2001
532 U.S. 952 (2001)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 26, 2001

Citations

532 U.S. 952 (2001)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Penson

The clarity of the oral sentence and the conflict with the written judgment means that we must consider the…

U.S. v. Amatel

Since then, every court that has considered such a challenge has rejected it and affirmed the legality of…