From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 29, 2001
534 U.S. 1000 (2001)

Opinion

OCTOBER 29, 2001


No. 01-5939 BISHOP v. COLORADO ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 12 Fed. Appx. 807.

No. 01-5953 TEZENO v. LOUISIANA. Ct. App. La., 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 771 So.2d 324.

No. 01-5959 LUCKY v. FLORIDA. Sup.Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 791 So.2d 1099.

No. 01-5963 NELSON v. CASTRO, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-5974 LEVY v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-5982 FRAZIER v. TEXAS. Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-5983 PARAMO v. CANDELARIA, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-5987 CLARK v. WASHINGTON. Sup.Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 143 Wn.2d 731, 24 P.3d 1006.

No. 01-6002 MITCHELL v. NORTH CAROLINA. Sup.Ct. N.C. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 353 N.C. 309, 543 S.E.2d 830.

No. 01-6004 KALSKI v. CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES. Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6005 BARBEE v. CALBONE, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 15 Fed. Appx. 752.

No. 01-6007 KOON v. SOUTH CAROLINA. Sup.Ct. S.C. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6008 MARTINEZ v. NOEL ET AL. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 263 F.3d 162.

No. 01-6016 ESTEP v. LaMARQUE, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6021 MOORE v. GIBSON, WARDEN. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 250 F.3d 1295.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 29, 2001
534 U.S. 1000 (2001)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 29, 2001

Citations

534 U.S. 1000 (2001)

Citing Cases

Wagner v. State

With respect to the timing of the shackling here, at least one court has held that, when the shackling occurs…

State v. Wolfe

"A statement that may be interpreted as commenting on a defendant's decision not to testify is improper if…