From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Dec 3, 2001
534 U.S. 1062 (2001)

Summary

rejecting inmate antitrust claim for prison telephone monopoly, noting "[s]tates and other public agencies do not violate the antitrust laws by charging fees or taxes that exploit the monopoly of force that is the definition of government . . . [n]or do the persons with whom the states contract violate the antitrust laws by becoming state concessionaires"

Summary of this case from Francis v. Lantz

Opinion

DECEMBER 3, 2001


No. 01-6965 WALWYN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 254 F.3d 73.

No. 01-6972 RODRIGUEZ-MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES; and ROSALES-GONZALEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 268 F.3d 1063 (first judgment); 273 F.3d 392 (second judgment).

No. 01-6973 McLaughlin v. UNITED STATES. Ct. App.D.C. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6993 CLAYTON v. UNITED STATES. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7000 EVANS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7004 LAWRACY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 254 F.3d 73.

No. 01-7005 WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 18 Fed. Appx. 52.

No. 01-7006 TROTTER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 268 F.3d 1066.

No. 01-7012 CASTELLANOS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 254 F.3d 73.

No. 01-7013 SOO YOUNG BAE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. D.C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 250 F.3d 774.

No. 01-7020 STEFFEN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 251 F.3d 1273.

No. 01-7021 RIVERA-ALONZO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 14 Fed. Appx. 955.

No. 01-7022 LUNA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 264 F.3d 1142.

No. 01-7024 JUSTICE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 14 Fed. Appx. 426.

No. 01-352 ARSBERRY ET AL. v. ILLINOIS ET AL. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE O'CONNOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 244 F.3d 558.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Dec 3, 2001
534 U.S. 1062 (2001)

rejecting inmate antitrust claim for prison telephone monopoly, noting "[s]tates and other public agencies do not violate the antitrust laws by charging fees or taxes that exploit the monopoly of force that is the definition of government . . . [n]or do the persons with whom the states contract violate the antitrust laws by becoming state concessionaires"

Summary of this case from Francis v. Lantz
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 3, 2001

Citations

534 U.S. 1062 (2001)

Citing Cases

Walton v. New York State Dept

on of the charged rate corresponding to the DOCS commission violated petitioners' rights to free speech and…

U.S. v. Gentry

The district court is required to apply the version of the Guidelines that is in effect at the time of…