From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jun 23, 2003
539 U.S. 947 (2003)

Opinion

JUNE 23, 2003.


No. 02-10252. GARY v. TEXAS. Ct. App. Tex., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10255. HARVEY v. PORTUONDO, SUPERINTENDENT, SHAWANGUNK CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10262. LEVER v. NORRIS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10263. JENKINS v. BRADSHAW ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 46 Fed. Appx. 570.

No. 02-10271. J.B.C. v. P.A.B. Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 813 A.2d 897 and 898.

No. 02-10272. MARVEL v. DELAWARE. Sup.Ct. Del. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 829 A.2d 141.

No. 02-10279. ZIMMERMAN v. GIURBINO, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 59 Fed. Appx. 174.

No. 02-10280. ROBINSON v. GIURBINO, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10282. PATTON v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10285. PRENATT v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY. Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10287. RIVERA v. ALAMEIDA, DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 53 Fed. Appx. 431.

No. 02-10293. SPYCHALA v. LEWIS, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10295. FARRIS v. NATIONSBANC MORTGAGE CORP. ET AL. Ct. App. Ga. Certiorari denied.

No. 02-10297. CHAVEZ v. FLORIDA. Sup.Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 832 So.2d 730.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jun 23, 2003
539 U.S. 947 (2003)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 23, 2003

Citations

539 U.S. 947 (2003)

Citing Cases

Chavez v. Palmer

McNair v. Allen, 515 F.3d 1168, 1174 (11th Cir. 2008). In Plaintiff's case, state review was complete on June…

State v. Capano

Since rendering those decisions, Florida repeatedly has upheld its statute. The following is a non-exclusive…