Summary
deciding not to toll for the ninety-day period in which a litigant potentially could have filed a petition for certiorari with the United States Supreme Court using the "properly filed application . . . is pending" language of § 2254(d), and specifically reserving for later the question of whether a petition for certiorari that has been filed with the United States Supreme Court falls within the statutory language of § 2254(d)
Summary of this case from Abela v. MartinOpinion
MARCH 26, 2001
No. 00-8332. BACON v. LEE, WARDEN. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 225 F.3d 470.
No. 00-8339. MATHIS v. SHAVERS CHEVROLET ET AL. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-8371. GONZALEZ v. WILLIAMS, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-8398. EPPS v. IOWA. Sup.Ct. Iowa. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-8434. PAYMENT v. BUREAU OF PRISONS ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 242 F.3d 390.
No. 00-8436. POWELL v. GREINER, SUPERINTENDENT, SING SING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-8439. KING v. CALIFORNIA. Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 82 Cal.App.4th 1363, 99 Cal.Rptr.2d 220.
No. 00-8492. MASON v. HARVEST FOODS. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-8493. MANNING v. WILLIAMS, WARDEN, ET AL. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-8499. GUTIERREZ v. SCHOMIG, WARDEN. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 233 F.3d 490.
No. 00-8515. STEVENS v. RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ET AL. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 248 F.3d 1131.
No. 00-8518. POOLE v. BRILEY, WARDEN. Sup.Ct. Ill. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-8538. FIELDS v. DALKON SHIELD CLAIMANTS TRUST. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 238 F.3d 410.
No. 00-8540. HERNANDEZ-DOMINGUEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 242 F.3d 391.
No. 00-8547. LOPEZ-REVI v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.