From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 885 (2000)

Summary

finding no violation of Fed.R.Evid. 403 where the other crimes evidence introduced is less serious than the underlying crimes charged, and a limiting instruction is given

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Paredes

Opinion

OCTOBER 2, 2000


00-5078 BARRON-ROBERTO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 215 F.3d 1334.

00-5079 WILLIS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 205 F.3d 1349.

00-5080 COLLIER v. MYERS, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-5082 WEEKES v. GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 213 F.3d 629.

00-5083 WHITEHEAD v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 200 F.3d 634.

00-5085 BROWN v. LYTLE, WARDEN. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 210 F.3d 389.

00-5086 PERKINS v. ILLINOIS. App. Ct. Ill., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 308 Ill. App.3d 1112, 764 N.E.2d 198.

00-5087 MONROE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 210 F.3d 373.

00-5088 AUSTIN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 215 F.3d 750.

00-5091 ROBINSON v. CALIFORNIA. Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.

00-5092 BOBBITT v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 203 F.3d 822.

00-5093 WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 205 F.3d 822.

00-5094 McCLOUD v. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. Sup.Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 767 So.2d 458.

00-5095 TERIO v. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 208 F.3d 204.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 2, 2000
531 U.S. 885 (2000)

finding no violation of Fed.R.Evid. 403 where the other crimes evidence introduced is less serious than the underlying crimes charged, and a limiting instruction is given

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Paredes

rejecting the argument that the district court lacked jurisdiction over the appellant's case because the interim appointment of the U.S. Attorney in the matter by the judges of the district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 546(d) violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution, U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 2

Summary of this case from Commonwealth of the N. Mariana Islands v. Zhen
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 2, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 885 (2000)

Citing Cases

Woods v. Adams

Second, if the prosecutor committed "misconduct," this Court must determine if such misconduct resulted in…

Woods v. Adams

Second, if the prosecutor committed "misconduct," this Court must determine if such misconduct resulted in…