From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jan 14, 2002
534 U.S. 1106 (2002)

Opinion

JANUARY 14, 2002


No. 01-7052. MCDERMOTT v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ET AL. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7054. ABDELMESSIH v. ZAKLAMA ET AL. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 254 F.3d 1077.

No. 01-7082. DASSENT v. ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7113. WALLS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 16 Fed. Appx. 253.

No. 01-7120. AGENT v. UNITED STATES;

No. 01-7139. ALEXANDER v. UNITED STATES;

No. 01-7356. PETE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 268 F.3d 1144.

No. 01-7135. BURTON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 268 F.3d 1064.

No. 01-7173. FRITTS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 5 Fed. Appx. 765.

No. 01-7175. SOTELO-GONZALEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 273 F.3d 1102.

No. 01-7201. FUENTES-ZUNIGA v. UNITED STATES; ROMAN-CARILLO v. UNITED STATES; and RIVERA-PADILLA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 17 Fed. Appx. 705 (first judgment); 19 Fed. Appx. 615 (second judgment); 19 Fed. Appx. 530 (third judgment).

No. 01-7208. RAMIRO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7252. KOBI v. LEONARD, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7260. BARRAZA-SOTO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 273 F.3d 1103.

No. 01-7262. DAVIS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 257 F.3d 1173.

No. 01-7263. DAVIS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below; 17 Fed. Appx. 652.

534 U.S. 1104


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Jan 14, 2002
534 U.S. 1106 (2002)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 14, 2002

Citations

534 U.S. 1106 (2002)

Citing Cases

Rehearing Denied

No. 01-6995 CHANEY v. CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY, 534 U.S. 1093; No. 01-7052 McDERMOTT v. INTERNAL REVENUE…

U.S. v. Stanley

This analysis governs both selective prosecution and selective enforcement claims, thus defendant must show…