From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Feb 25, 2002
534 U.S. 1167 (2002)

Opinion

FEBRUARY 25, 2002


No. 01-7727. LOPEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11h Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7728. JONASSAINT v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 253 F.3d 709.

No. 01-7730. JACKSON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 15 Fed. Appx. 87.

No. 01-7731. SMITH v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 26 Fed. Appx. 433.

No. 01-7732. CUMMINGS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 18 Fed. Appx. 135.

No. 01-7735. HOWARD v. LITSCHER, SECRETARY, WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7742. PAREDES v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7745. THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7753. BAGGETT v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 251 F.3d 1087.

No. 01-7754. BARRERA-ANICA v. UNITED STATES. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 265 F.3d 1057.

No. 01-7755. ADKINS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 17 Fed. Appx. 494.

No. 01-7759. CASTRO-HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 258 F.3d 1057.

No. 01-7761. DANIELS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 19 Fed. Appx. 122.

No. 01-7763. CUNNINGHAM v. SCIBANA, WARDEN. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 259 F.3d 303.

No. 01-7781. CADERNO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 256 F.3d 1213.

No. 01-7782. LEATH v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 14 Fed. Appx. 240.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Feb 25, 2002
534 U.S. 1167 (2002)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 25, 2002

Citations

534 U.S. 1167 (2002)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Quiros-Acosta

We reject Quiros-Acosta's contention that the upward adjustment under § 3B1.4 requires a minor's active…

U.S. v. Nardelli

A review of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is viewed from the perspective of defense counsel, and…