From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Nov 27, 2000
531 U.S. 1024 (2000)

Opinion

NOVEMBER 27, 2000


00-6636 JOHNSON ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 219 F.3d 349.

00-6640 MEDINA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 221 F.3d 1353

00-6644 CHANEY v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-6645 EDWARDS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 228 F.3d 413.

00-6646 PARTON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 225 F.3d 660.

00-6647 McHENRY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 221 F.3d 1353.

00-6651 CORRIGAN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 217 F.3d 841.

00-6654 DITTRICH v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 204 F.3d 819.

00-6655 DORROUGH v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-6656 SANDERS v. WYOMING. Sup.Ct. Wyo. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 7 P.3d 842.

00-6657 SIMPKINS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 217 F.3d 842.

00-6660 RUELAS-ARREGUIN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 219 F.3d 1056.

00-6661 SOLIS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-6663 RAY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 225 F.3d 660.

00-6667 MEDINA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11 th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 228 F.3d 417.

00-6669 MAHLER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 228 F.3d 412.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Nov 27, 2000
531 U.S. 1024 (2000)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 27, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 1024 (2000)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Promise

It is appropriate to refuse to notice a plain error when evidence of guilt is overwhelming. See Johnson, 520…

U.S. v. Lewis

That is manifestly not the case here. Second, no right to severance arises because the evidence against one…