From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 1, 2001
534 U.S. 835 (2001)

Opinion

OCTOBER 1, 2001


No. 00-9820 ALBERTO GUTIERREZ v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-9822 HUGHES v. SMALL, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-9823 HUDSON v. ANGELONE, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 238 F.3d 412.

No. 00-9825 FLOWERS v. HALEY, COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-9826 SHABAZZ v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 245 F.3d 790.

No. 00-9829 GARZA v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-9830 JEFFRIES v. KAPTURE, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-9831 LANE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 248 F.3d 1185.

No. 00-9833 FLANIGAN v. COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 00-9834 FRANCISCO GONZALEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 239 F.3d 368.

No. 00-9839 RUTHERFORD v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 248 F.3d 1177.

No. 00-9843 OBI v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 239 F.3d 662.

No. 00-9849 MELVIN v. KELLY SPRINGFIELD TIRE CORP. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 232 F.3d 888.

No. 00-9850 KILPATRICK v. MEADOWS, WARDEN. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Oct 1, 2001
534 U.S. 835 (2001)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 1, 2001

Citations

534 U.S. 835 (2001)

Citing Cases

Melvin v. Kelly Springfield Tire Corp.

October 7, 2002. 534 U.S. 835; Petition for rehearing denied.…

Allen v. U.S.

It is correct that neither the government nor the Court can rely upon a conviction which was omitted from a §…