From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Feb 19, 2002
534 U.S. 1153 (2002)

Opinion

FEBRUARY 19, 2002


No. 01-7616. COOPER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 15 Fed. Appx. 115.

No. 01-7618. CREWS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 18 Fed. Appx. 196.

No. 01-7620. COGGINS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 15 Fed. Appx. 164.

No. 01-7622. REGASSA v. UNITED STATES. Ct. App.D.C. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 794 A.2d 257.

No. 01-7624. TISDALE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 248 F.3d 964.

No. 01-7628. COLE v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7638. NELSON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7639. JONES v. WISCONSIN. Ct. App. Wis. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7640. BLACK v. MISSOURI. Sup.Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 50 S.W.3d 778.

No. 01-7641. BOGARD v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7642. ARIAS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-7643. ALLEN v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 14 Fed. Appx. 341.

No. 01-7646. ALEXANDRINI v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 20 Fed. Appx. 24.

No. 01-7650. SADLER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 18 Fed. Appx. 82.

No. 01-7654. LEWIS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F.3d 1095.

No. 01-7664. MONTES-LIRA, AKA LIRA v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F.3d 1101.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Feb 19, 2002
534 U.S. 1153 (2002)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 19, 2002

Citations

534 U.S. 1153 (2002)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Tsosie

Generally, such failure results in a review for plain error only. See United States v. Tisdale, 248 F.3d 964,…

U.S. v. Thompson

Inadvertent omissions do not overcome the presumption that an officer acted in good faith reliance on the…