Summary
holding that, to prove prejudice, a defendant must show that counsel's default was of such magnitude that the verdict would have been different absent the alleged ineffectiveness
Summary of this case from Williams v. StickmanOpinion
JUNE 11, 2001
No. 00-7926. PANTOJA-NUNEZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir Certiorari denied. Reported below: 229 F.3d 1169.
No. 00-7981. HOGAN v. TEXAS. Ct. App. Tex., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-8148. HARRISON, AKA WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. D.C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-8471. LANIER v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 238 F.3d 425.
No. 00-8628. BAYLY v. CALIFORNIA. Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-8734. COX v. PENNSYLVANIA. Sup.Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 556 Pa. 368, 728 A.2d 923.
No. 00-8804. ARROYO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 234 F.3d 711.
No. 00-8901. PACHECO v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 225 F.3d 148.
No. 00-8911. TREVINO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 244 F.3d 134.
No. 00-8920. MCGHEE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 211 F.3d 597.
No. 00-9116. BURNS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 229 F. F.3d 1159.
No. 00-9256. TREESH v. OHIO. Sup.Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 90 Ohio St.3d 460, 739 N.E.2d 749.
No. 00-9279. KHAN v. PORTUONDO, SUPERINTENDENT, SHAWANGUNK CORRECTIONAL FACILITY. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 242 F.3d 365.
No. 00-9282. BREWER v. OKLAHOMA. Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-9284. ANDERSON v. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 11th. Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 00-9295. PRUITT v. YUKINS, WARDEN. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.