From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Nov 13, 2001
534 U.S. 1034 (2001)

Opinion

NOVEMBER 13, 2001


No. 01-6750 CRUZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A.2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6754 RIVERA-RAMIREZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 265 F.3d 1058.

No. 01-6758 QUILLING v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 261 F.3d 707.

No. 01-6760 RIVERA-ALVAREZ v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 15 Fed. Appx. 716.

No. 01-6761 RIOS-CASTANO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 265 F.3d 1060.

No. 01-6762 SANDS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 260 F.3d 626.

No. 01-6765 BENALLY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 13 Fed. Appx. 750.

No. 01-6767 MONTGOMERY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 262 F.3d 233.

No. 01-6768 WATTS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6769 PIRELLO v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 255 F.3d 728.

No. 01-6770 BRANCH v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6771 WILSON v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 18 Fed. Appx. 611.

No. 01-6773 STEELE v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 202 F.3d 262.

No. 01-6774 STURKS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 248 F.3d 1183.

No. 01-6775 SKAMFER v. LITSCHER, SECRETARY, WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

No. 01-6781 LOCKLEAR v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 15 Fed. Appx. 76.


Summaries of

Certiorari Denied

U.S.
Nov 13, 2001
534 U.S. 1034 (2001)
Case details for

Certiorari Denied

Case Details

Full title:CERTIORARI DENIED

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 13, 2001

Citations

534 U.S. 1034 (2001)

Citing Cases

Zimmerman v. U.S.

Prosecutors are required to charge in the conjunctive in such cases. United States v. Montgomery, 262 F.3d…

U.S. v. Neal

" Accordingly, . . . appellate courts, including [the Fourth Circuit], have developed a "dual jurisdiction"…