From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CERO v. ASTRUE

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Nov 22, 2010
2:09-CV-02086-PMP-LRL (D. Nev. Nov. 22, 2010)

Opinion

2:09-CV-02086-PMP-LRL.

November 22, 2010


ORDER


Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. #17) of the Honorable Lawrence R. Leavitt, United States Magistrate Judge entered November 1, 2010. No objections have been filed. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule IB 1-4 and determines that Magistrate Judge Leavitt's Recommendation should be Affirmed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff Dean Cero's Motion for Reversal and/or Remand (Doc. #11) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #16) is GRANTED and this action is hereby DISMISSED.

DATED: November 22, 2010.


Summaries of

CERO v. ASTRUE

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Nov 22, 2010
2:09-CV-02086-PMP-LRL (D. Nev. Nov. 22, 2010)
Case details for

CERO v. ASTRUE

Case Details

Full title:DEAN CERO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Nov 22, 2010

Citations

2:09-CV-02086-PMP-LRL (D. Nev. Nov. 22, 2010)