From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cerner Corp. v. Visicu, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 15, 2012
469 F. App'x 903 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Opinion

2011-1209, -1210

03-15-2012

CERNER CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VISICU, INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant.

BART A. STARR, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, L.L.P., of Kansas City, Missouri, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were B. TRENT WEBB, JONATHAN N. ZERGER and RYAN D. DYKAL. WILLIAM K. WEST, JR., Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-cross appellant. Of counsel on the brief were ALAN M. GRIMALDI, BRIAN A. ROSENTHAL and ROBERT E. MCBRIDE, Mayer Brown, LLP, of Washington, DC.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri in No. 04-CV-1033, Judge Gary A. Fenner.

JUDGMENT

BART A. STARR, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, L.L.P., of Kansas City, Missouri, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were B. TRENT WEBB, JONATHAN N. ZERGER and RYAN D. DYKAL.

WILLIAM K. WEST, JR., Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-cross appellant. Of counsel on the brief were ALAN M. GRIMALDI, BRIAN A. ROSENTHAL and ROBERT E. MCBRIDE, Mayer Brown, LLP, of Washington, DC.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LINN, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

______________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

Cerner Corp. v. Visicu, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 15, 2012
469 F. App'x 903 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Cerner Corp. v. Visicu, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CERNER CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VISICU, INC., Defendant-Cross…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 15, 2012

Citations

469 F. App'x 903 (Fed. Cir. 2012)