Opinion
Civil Action 22-cv-02206-RM-SP
06-09-2023
CENTURYLINK OF FLORIDA, INC. d/b/a CenturyLink, et al., Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants, v. AT&T CORP., et al., Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs.
ORDER
RAYMOND P. MOORE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Susan Prose (ECF No. 85) to deny without prejudice Defendants' Motion to Transfer (ECF No. 34) in light of the parties' Notice of Settlement (ECF No. 82). The Recommendation advised that specific written objections were due within fourteen days after being served a copy of the Recommendation, and none has been filed. See Summers v. Utah, 927 F.3d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) (“In the absence of a timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate judge's report under any standard it deems appropriate.”).
Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Recommendation (ECF No. 85), and the Motion to Transfer (ECF No. 34) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.