From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Century Aluminum Co. v. AGCS Marine Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 14, 2011
No. C 11-02514 EMC (NC) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-02514 EMC (NC)

11-14-2011

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. AGCS MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.


ORDER RE DISCOVERY PROCEDURES

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins. The Court's schedule and answers to frequently asked scheduling questions are posted on the District Court's website, http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ . Any scheduling issues should be directed to Magistrate Judge Cousins' Courtroom Deputy Lili Harrell at 415.522.2039, Lili_Harrell@cand.uscourts.gov ,

Discovery motions are heard on Magistrate Judge Cousins' civil calendar on Wednesday mornings at 9:00 a.m.

1. Discovery motions may be addressed to the Court in three ways:

(1) A motion may be noticed for hearing in not less than 35 days under Civil L.R. 7-2.

(2) Any party may seek an order to shorten or enlarge time under Civil L.R. 6-3.

(3) In emergencies during discovery events, the Court is available for phone consultation (415.522.2112) as set forth in Civil L.R. 37-1(b).

2. In the event a discovery dispute arises, counsel (of if pro se, the party) seeking discovery or a protective order shall confer in good faith with opposing counsel (or pro se party) in an effort to resolve the dispute without court action, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 and Civil L.R. 37-1(a). A declaration setting forth these meet and confer efforts and the final positions of each party shall be included in the moving papers. The Court will not consider discovery motions unless the moving party has complied with Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 and Civil L.R. 37-1(a).

3. Motions to compel fact discovery must be filed within the time limits contained in Civil L.R. 26-2. Motions to compel expert discovery must be filed within the time limits contained in Civil L.R. 26-2.

4. Motions for sanctions shall be filed by separate motion in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 and Civil L.R. 37-3. The parties shall comply with their meet and confer obligations under Civil L.R. 37-1(a). Parties who refuse to meet and confer will be subject to sanctions under Civil L.R. 37-3.

5. All filings of documents relating to motions referred to Magistrate Judge Cousins shall list the civil case number and the District Court Judge's initials followed by the designation "(NC)". At the time of filing of original papers with the Clerk's Office, the parties are required to submit two copies of each document, one of which shall be designated "NC Chambers Copy". If documents are filed electronically, a paper chambers copy of each electronically filed document must be delivered to the Court and addressed to Magistrate Judge Cousins no later than noon on the day after e-filing.

6. All parties shall supplement or correct their initial disclosures, expert disclosures, pretrial disclosures, and responses to discovery requests under the circumstances itemized by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e)(1), and when ordered by the Court. The Court expects that the parties will supplement and/or correct their disputes promptly when required under that Rule, without the need for a request from opposing counsel. In additions to the general requirements of Rule 26(e)(1), the parties shall supplement and/or correct all previously made disclosures and discovery responses 28 days before the fact discovery cutoff date.

7. The Court strives to render decisions in a timely manner. The Court encourages parties to advise the Court by letter to Chambers or any matter that appears to have been unduly delayed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

NATHANAEL COUSINS

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Century Aluminum Co. v. AGCS Marine Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 14, 2011
No. C 11-02514 EMC (NC) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Century Aluminum Co. v. AGCS Marine Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. AGCS MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 14, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-02514 EMC (NC) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2011)