Centripetal Networks, LLC v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

Full title: CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, LLC, Appellant v. PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC., Appellee

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: May 13, 2024

No. 2023-1528 (Fed. Cir. May. 13, 2024)

Opinion

2023-1730

05-13-2024

CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, LLC, Appellant v. PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC., Appellee

JAMES R. HANNAH, Kramer Levin Naftalis &Frankel LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by PAUL J. ANDRE; JEFFREY PRICE, New York, NY; JOHN R. HUTCHINS, SCOTT M. KELLY, BRADLEY CHARLES WRIGHT, Banner &Witcoff, Ltd., Washington, DC. DOUGLAS HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER, Ropes &Gray LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by JAMES RICHARD BATCHELDER, ANDREW T. RADSCH, East Palo Alto, CA; COLIN DUNN, New York, NY.

PER CURIAM

This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021-01157.

JAMES R. HANNAH, Kramer Levin Naftalis &Frankel LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by PAUL J. ANDRE; JEFFREY PRICE, New York, NY; JOHN R. HUTCHINS, SCOTT M. KELLY, BRADLEY CHARLES WRIGHT, Banner &Witcoff, Ltd., Washington, DC.

DOUGLAS HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER, Ropes &Gray LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by JAMES RICHARD BATCHELDER, ANDREW T. RADSCH, East Palo Alto, CA; COLIN DUNN, New York, NY.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM

TARANTO, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.