Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Sys.

Full title: CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, INC., Appellant v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 11, 2021

2020-1713 (Fed. Cir. May. 11, 2021)

Opinion

2020-1634 2020-1829

05-11-2021

CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, INC., Appellant v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee

JAMES R. HANNAH, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Menlo Park, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by PAUL J. ANDRE; JEFFREY PRICE, New York, NY. JEFFREY BLAKE, Merchant & Gould PC, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellee. Also represented by DANIEL W. MCDONALD, Minneapolis, MN; MICHAEL WAGNER, Denver, CO.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2018-01386, IPR2018-01512.

JUDGMENT

JAMES R. HANNAH, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Menlo Park, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by PAUL J. ANDRE; JEFFREY PRICE, New York, NY. JEFFREY BLAKE, Merchant & Gould PC, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellee. Also represented by DANIEL W. MCDONALD, Minneapolis, MN; MICHAEL WAGNER, Denver, CO. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 11, 2021

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court