From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Sys.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 11, 2021
2020-1768 (Fed. Cir. May. 11, 2021)

Opinion

2020-1768

05-11-2021

CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, INC., Appellant v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee

JAMES R. HANNAH, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Menlo Park, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by PAUL J. ANDRE; JEFFREY PRICE, New York, NY. THEODORE M. FOSTER, Haynes & Boone, LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by DAVID L. MCCOMBS, DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS; ANGELA OLIVER, Washington, DC.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-01454.

JUDGMENT

JAMES R. HANNAH, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Menlo Park, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by PAUL J. ANDRE; JEFFREY PRICE, New York, NY. THEODORE M. FOSTER, Haynes & Boone, LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by DAVID L. MCCOMBS, DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS; ANGELA OLIVER, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 11, 2021

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Sys.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 11, 2021
2020-1768 (Fed. Cir. May. 11, 2021)
Case details for

Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Sys.

Case Details

Full title:CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, INC., Appellant v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 11, 2021

Citations

2020-1768 (Fed. Cir. May. 11, 2021)