From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Centrillo v. Route 6 22 Realty, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 8, 1994
207 A.D.2d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

August 8, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, we conclude that the defendant amply demonstrated a reasonable excuse for its default in answering the complaint (see, Price v. Polisner, 172 A.D.2d 422; Fox v. Bicanic, 163 A.D.2d 272; Murphy v. D.V. Waste Control Corp., 124 A.D.2d 573). Furthermore, the existence of a meritorious defense was established through the affidavit of the defendant's president who had personal knowledge concerning the condition of the parking lot where the plaintiff's injuries allegedly took place (see, David Sanders, P.C. v. Sanders, Architects, 140 A.D.2d 787; cf., Cooper v. Badruddin, 192 A.D.2d 997; Whitbeck v. Erin's Isle, 109 A.D.2d 1032). We therefore conclude that the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the defendant's motion to vacate the default judgment (see, Perellie v. Crimson's Rest., 108 A.D.2d 903), and note that the court conditioned the vacatur on payment to the plaintiff of a $2,000 penalty (see, Murphy v. D.V. Waste Control Corp., supra). Mangano, P.J., Balletta, O'Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Centrillo v. Route 6 22 Realty, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 8, 1994
207 A.D.2d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Centrillo v. Route 6 22 Realty, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SHIRLEY F. CENTRILLO, Appellant, v. ROUTE 6 22 REALTY, INC., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 8, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 371 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
616 N.Y.S.2d 220

Citing Cases

Juseinoski v. Board of Educ. of City of N.Y

The defendants failed on both accounts. An insurance carrier's delay is insufficient to establish a…

Casserley v. County of Westchester

Further, there is no indication that defendants would be prejudiced if this matter is restored to the…