Opinion
No. CV99-0586033
August 31, 2000
RULING ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH STIPULATION (#108)
Pursuant to motion # 102, the court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff's on February 8, 2000 (Peck, J.). Thereafter, on July 17, 2000, the parties joined in filing a stipulation to judgment (# 109), ostensibly setting forth the manner in which the defendants had agreed to honor the specific terms of the judgment previously entered. Conforming to this agreement, the plaintiff has submitted a motion for judgment in accordance with stipulation (#108). As this motion is both akin to a motion in aid of judgment and consistent with the order of February 8, 2000, the relief requested is hereby GRANTED.
See Gentile v. Ives, 163 Conn. 281, 303 A.2d 720 (1972); see also Timberland Development Corp. v. Planning Zoning 43 Conn. App. 606, CT Page 10749 684 A.2d 1216 (1996).
BY THE COURT, N. Rubinow, J.