From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Centofante v. Ferguson

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Nov 2, 2023
No. CV-23-624 (Ark. Nov. 2, 2023)

Opinion

CV-23-624

11-02-2023

Christina Centofante, Roger Henley, Barbara Ann Henley, Scott Stubenrauch, Cheryl Stubenrauch, Stanley Butski, Noelle Butski, John Killingsworth, Cheryl Killingsworth, Heath Henderson, Mary Katherine Henderson, Donald Robert Hudson, Bridget Hudson, Dale McDaniel, Tonya McDaniel, Clayton Moore, Miranda Moore, Randall Van Den Berghe, Cynthia Van Den Berghe, and Pinnacle Mountain Community Coalition v. Rick Ferguson; Paradise Valley, LLC; Waterview Estates, LLC; Waterview Meadows, LLC; Waterview Estates Phase III, LLC; Waterview Estates Phase VI and VII, LLC; AFF Holdings, LLC; the Pulaski County Property Owners Multipurpose Improvement District No. 2021-2; Capital City Property Holdings, LLC; and Pulaski County, Arkansas


From Pulaski County Circuit Court, Fourth Division.

Petitioners' petition for writ of prohibition is denied.

PER CURIAM ORDER

REHEARING DENIED

Petition for rehearing was denied.


Summaries of

Centofante v. Ferguson

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Nov 2, 2023
No. CV-23-624 (Ark. Nov. 2, 2023)
Case details for

Centofante v. Ferguson

Case Details

Full title:Christina Centofante, Roger Henley, Barbara Ann Henley, Scott Stubenrauch…

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 2, 2023

Citations

No. CV-23-624 (Ark. Nov. 2, 2023)