Center v. Marina

3 Citing cases

  1. CENTER FOR BIO. v. MARINA POINT DEV

    560 F.3d 903 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 4 times

    ORDER Upon reconsideration of the attorney fee issues, we amend our Opinion filed on August 6, 2008, and commencing at slip op. 9919, 535 F.3d 1026, as follows:

  2. Center for Biological Div. v. Marina Point

    566 F.3d 794 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 82 times
    Holding that a district court lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate CWA claims when CWA notices were insufficient

    The original opinion is published as Center for Biological Diversity v. Marina Point Development Co., 535 F.3d 1026 (9th Cir. 2008).

  3. Gengler v. United States ex rel. Dept. of Defense and Navy

    682 F. Supp. 2d 1117 (E.D. Cal. 2010)   Cited 1 times
    Explaining that the figure generated from this computation is presumed to represent a reasonable fee award

    See also Carbonell, supra, 429 F.3d at 899: "[A]lthough Carbonell obtained relief that was not an enforceable judgment on the merits or a consent decree, he nonetheless can qualify as a prevailing party." But see Center for Biological Diversity v. Marina Development Co., 535 F.3d 1026, 1037 n. 16 (9th Cir. 2008): The mere fact that the Center achieved a preliminary injunction will not support an award of fees.