From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Center for Sierra Nevada Conservation v. Villalvazo

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 6, 2013
2:09-cv-2523-LKK-JFM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2013)

Opinion

          David A. Bahr, (OSB No. 90199) Bahr Law Offices, P.C., Eugene, OR.

          Lisa T. Belenky (CSB No. 203225) Center for Biological Diversity, San Francisco, CA.

          Erik Schlenker-Goodrich, (New Mexico Bar No. 7875) Western Environmental Law Center, Taos, New Mexico, Attorneys for Plaintiffs

          ROBERT G. DREHER, Acting Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division,

          JASON A. HILL, (DC 477543) JOHN P. TUSTIN (TX 24056458) Trial Attorneys Natural Resources Section, J. BRETT GROSKO, (Maryland Bar) Trial Attorney Wildlife and Marine Resources Section Environment and Natural Resources Division, U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D.C. Attorneys for Federal Defendants


          PLAINTIFFS' AND FEDERAL DEFENDANTS' STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING THE DEADLINE FOR MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS

          LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge.

         Whereas by order dated July 26, 2013, the Court stayed briefing on Plaintiffs' petition for costs and attorney fees until September 5, 2013, by which time the Parties were to advise the Court on the status of the their settlement discussions. Dkt. No. 138;

         Whereas Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants have engaged in substantive good-faith discussions attempting to negotiate a settlement of the issue of costs and attorney fees;

         Whereas Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants have identified terms for an agreement in principle that resolves Plaintiffs' claim for costs and attorney fees and drafted a proposed agreement;

         Whereas the proposed agreement remains subject to the review and approval by the appropriate supervisory officials at the Department of Justice;

         Whereas the Federal Defendants estimate that it will take approximately two additional weeks to complete the review and gain approval of the proposed agreement by the appropriate supervisory officials at the Department of Justice;

         Whereas Defendant-Intervenors have not participated in the negotiations, and thus have not formed a position, but have been consulted regarding this stipulation, and do not oppose any request that the primary parties continue negotiations;

         Accordingly, Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants stipulate and agree, and request that the Court enter an order staying until September 19, 2013, the deadline for Plaintiffs to file a motion for attorneys' fees, costs, and other expenses. If no agreement appears forthcoming, the Parties will submit a proposed schedule for briefing the fee petition. By entering into this Stipulation, Federal Defendants do not waive any defenses as to whether Plaintiffs are entitled to any attorneys' fees, costs or expenses in this case.

          ORDER

         This matter having come before the Court upon Plaintiffs' and Federal Defendants' stipulation and proposed order regarding the deadline for motion for attorneys' fees and costs, and the Court being fully advised in the premises and good cause appearing;

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that briefing on Plaintiffs' application for fees and costs is stayed until September 19, 2013. If no agreement appears forthcoming, the Parties will submit a proposed schedule for briefing the fee petition.


Summaries of

Center for Sierra Nevada Conservation v. Villalvazo

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Sep 6, 2013
2:09-cv-2523-LKK-JFM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Center for Sierra Nevada Conservation v. Villalvazo

Case Details

Full title:CENTER FOR SIERRA NEVADA CONSERVATION, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 6, 2013

Citations

2:09-cv-2523-LKK-JFM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2013)