From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Centeno v. Montesa, LLC

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 12, 2014
No. 62506 (Nev. Dec. 12, 2014)

Opinion

No. 62506

12-12-2014

MARTIN CENTENO, Appellant, v. MONTESA, LLC, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF REVERSAL AND REMAND

This is a proper person appeal from a district court order granting a motion to dismiss in a quiet title action. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Rob Bare, Judge.

The district court granted respondent's motion to dismiss, finding that appellant had failed to state a viable claim for relief because NRS 116.3116(2)'s superpriority provision does not extinguish a first security interest. This court's recent disposition in SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. ___, 334 P.3d 408 (2014), decides that a common-interest community association's NRS 116.3116(2) superpriority lien has true priority over a first security interest, and the association may nonjudicially foreclose on that lien. The district court's decision thus was based on an erroneous interpretation of the controlling law and did not reach the other issues colorably asserted. Accordingly, we

REVERSE the order granting the motion to dismiss AND REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order.

/ s /_________, C.J.

Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Pickering
/s/_________, J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge

Martin Centeno

Greenberg Traurig, LLP/Las Vegas

Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Las Vegas

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Centeno v. Montesa, LLC

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 12, 2014
No. 62506 (Nev. Dec. 12, 2014)
Case details for

Centeno v. Montesa, LLC

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN CENTENO, Appellant, v. MONTESA, LLC, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 12, 2014

Citations

No. 62506 (Nev. Dec. 12, 2014)