From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Centeno v. Justice Court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 8, 2014
No. 65573 (Nev. May. 8, 2014)

Opinion

No. 65573

05-08-2014

MARTIN CENTENO, Petitioner, v. JUSTICE COURT, LAS VEGAS TOWNSHIP, IN AND FOR CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA; AND THE HONORABLE CYNTHIA L. CRUZ, Respondents, and U.S. BANK, NA, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO BANK OF AMERICA N.A. SUCCESSOR TO LA SALLE BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE ON BEHALF OF THE HOLDERS OF THE WAMU MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2007-OA3, Real Party in Interest.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION

This is an original proper person petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenging a justice court order in an unlawful detainer action.

A writ of mandamus is available to compel the performance of an act that the law requires as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station or to control an arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion. NRS 34.160; Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008). This court may issue a writ of prohibition to arrest the proceedings of a court exercising its judicial functions when such proceedings are in excess of the court's jurisdiction. NRS 34.320. This court has the discretion to determine whether a writ petition will be considered, Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991), and petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that this court's extraordinary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Here, petitioner challenges the justice court's exercise of jurisdiction over the underlying unlawful detainer action and alleges that the justice court has improperly issued a temporary writ of restitution and refused to transfer or stay the case pending petitioner's district court quiet title action. Having considered the documents before us, we conclude that petitioner has not met his burden of demonstrating that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted. Pan, 120 Nev. at 228-29, 88 P.3d at 844. Accordingly, we deny the petition. Id.; NRAP 21(b)(1).

It is so ORDERED.

__________, J.

Hardesty

__________, J.

Douglas

__________, J.

Cherry
cc: Hon. Cynthia L. Cruz, Justice of the Peace

Martin Centeno

Tiffany & Bosco, P. A.

Las Vegas Justice Court Clerk


Summaries of

Centeno v. Justice Court

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 8, 2014
No. 65573 (Nev. May. 8, 2014)
Case details for

Centeno v. Justice Court

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN CENTENO, Petitioner, v. JUSTICE COURT, LAS VEGAS TOWNSHIP, IN AND…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: May 8, 2014

Citations

No. 65573 (Nev. May. 8, 2014)