From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Centeno v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 6, 2014
584 F. App'x 476 (9th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 11-73606

08-06-2014

MARCELINA QUINTANILLA CENTENO, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Agency No. A091-837-704 MEMORANDUM On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued April 10, 2014
Submitted August 4, 2014
San Francisco, California
Before: NOONAN, NGUYEN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Marcelina Quintanilla Centeno, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, challenges the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") denial of her request for a remand so that the immigration judge ("IJ") may conduct an inquiry into her competency. Our review is for abuse of discretion, see Garcia-Quintero v. Gonzales, 455 F.3d 1006, 1011 (9th Cir. 2006), and 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a) grants us jurisdiction.

On May 4, 2011—six days before Quintanilla Centeno's removal hearing—the BIA issued a precedential opinion outlining the framework for IJs to use when faced with a noncitizen showing some "indicia of incompetency." See In re M-A-M-, 25 I. & N. Dec. 474 (B.I.A. 2011). In short, under In re M-A-M-, although noncitizens are "presumed" competent, id. at 477, steps must be taken to protect those who "lack sufficient competency to meaningfully participate in proceedings," id. at 482. Quintanilla Centeno argues that, because she presented "indicia of incompetency," the BIA abused its discretion by not granting a remand for the IJ to conduct the required competency inquiry. We agree.

In spite of some indications that Quintanilla Centeno was suffering from severe depression and may have recently discontinued her psychiatric medication, the IJ did not "make further inquiry to determine whether [she was] competent for purposes of immigration proceedings," as In re M-A-M- requires. 25 I. & N. Dec. at 484.

Accordingly, we grant the petition and remand for the BIA to instruct the IJ to apply In re M-A-M-. We need not address Quintanilla Centeno's remaining claims.

PETITION GRANTED; REMANDED.


Summaries of

Centeno v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 6, 2014
584 F. App'x 476 (9th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Centeno v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:MARCELINA QUINTANILLA CENTENO, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr.…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 6, 2014

Citations

584 F. App'x 476 (9th Cir. 2014)