From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cenname v. Lindholm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 16, 1979
69 A.D.2d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Opinion

April 16, 1979


In Action No. 1, a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated December 11, 1978, which denied their motion for a special preference, without prejudice to renewal after a decision is rendered in a pending no-fault arbitration, and upon a "more detailed explanation of the extent of the movant's present rate of assistance from the Department of Social Services as well as a statement of any other sources of income which the family is receiving." Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion for a special preference granted. A special preference should be granted in this negligence action in the interest of justice (see CPLR 3403, subd [a], par 3), since there has been a showing of indigency and an inability to work since the date of the accident (see Biengardo v. Ter Bush, 54 A.D.2d 570; Brenton v. Tiripicchio, 54 A.D.2d 571). Plaintiffs have submitted an affidavit from the Commissioner of the Orange County Department of Social Services, dated October 27, 1978, setting forth the benefits paid to plaintiff Douglas Cenname, Sr., in the amount of $1,506, and further stating that he is presently a recipient of public assistance. In addition, plaintiff Douglas Cenname, Sr., submitted his own affidavit stating, inter alia, his indigency, which in and of itself established his right to a special preference. Lazer, J.P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cenname v. Lindholm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 16, 1979
69 A.D.2d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)
Case details for

Cenname v. Lindholm

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS CENNAME, JR., et al., Appellants, v. KARL LINDHOLM et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 16, 1979

Citations

69 A.D.2d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1979)

Citing Cases

Smith v. City of New York

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, with costs, and the motion is…

Sanchez v. Bellair Laser Ctr., Inc.

n entitlement to a trial preference in the interests of justice. (See Geralds v Damiano, 128 AD3d 550 [1 Dept…